|
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
|
|
|
California State Lemon Law Statutes
California Lemon Law Statutes Cal Civ Code § 1793.22
Cal Civ Code § 1793.22 (2004)
§ 1793.22. Reasonable number of attempts to conform vehicle to warranties;
Dispute resolution process; Transfer of vehicle
1. This section shall be known and may be cited as the Tanner Consumer
Protection Act.
|
2. It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been
made to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties
if, within 18 months from delivery to the buyer or 18,000 miles on the
odometer of the vehicle, whichever occurs first, one or more of the
following occurs:
1. The same nonconformity results in a condition that is likely to cause
death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven and the
nonconformity has been subject to repair two or more times by the
manufacturer or its agents, and the buyer or lessee has at least once
directly notified the manufacturer of the need for the repair of the
nonconformity.
2. The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by
the manufacturer or its agents and the buyer has at least once directly
notified the manufacturer of the need for the repair of the nonconformity.
3. The vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of nonconformities by
the manufacturer or its agents for a cumulative total of more than 30
calendar days since delivery of the vehicle to the buyer. The 30-day limit
shall be extended only if repairs cannot be performed due to conditions
beyond the control of the manufacturer or its agents. The buyer shall be
required to directly notify the manufacturer pursuant to paragraphs (1)
and (2) only if the manufacturer has clearly and conspicuously disclosed
to the buyer, with the warranty or the owner's manual, the provisions of
this section and that of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2, including the
requirement that the buyer must notify the manufacturer directly pursuant
to paragraphs (1) and (2). The notification, if required, shall be sent to
the address, if any, specified clearly and conspicuously by the
manufacturer in the warranty or owner's manual. This presumption shall be
a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof, and it may be
asserted by the buyer in any civil action, including an action in small
claims court, or other formal or informal proceeding.
3. If a qualified third-party dispute resolution process exists, and the
buyer receives timely notification in writing of the availability of that
qualified third-party dispute resolution process with a description of its
operation and effect, the presumption in subdivision (b) may not be
asserted by the buyer until after the buyer has initially resorted to the
qualified third-party dispute resolution process as required in
subdivision (d). Notification of the availability of the qualified
third-party dispute resolution process is not timely if the buyer suffers
any prejudice resulting from any delay in giving the notification. If a
qualified third-party dispute resolution process does not exist, or if the
buyer is dissatisfied with that third-party decision, or if the
manufacturer or its agent neglects to promptly fulfill the terms of the
qualified third-party dispute resolution process decision after the
decision is accepted by the buyer, the buyer may assert the presumption
provided in subdivision (b) in an action to enforce the buyer's rights
under subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2. The findings and decision of a
qualified third-party dispute resolution process shall be admissible in
evidence in the action without further foundation. Any period of
limitation of actions under any federal or California laws with respect to
any person shall be extended for a period equal to the number of days
between the date a complaint is filed with a third-party dispute
resolution process and the date of its decision or the date before which
the manufacturer or its agent is required by the decision to fulfill its
terms if the decision is accepted by the buyer, whichever occurs later.
4. A qualified third-party dispute resolution process shall be one that
does all of the following:
1. Complies with the minimum requirements of the Federal Trade Commission
for informal dispute settlement procedures as set forth in Part 703 of
Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those regulations read on
January 1, 1987.
2. Renders decisions which are binding on the manufacturer if the buyer
elects to accept the decision.
3. Prescribes a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days after the decision
is accepted by the buyer, within which the manufacturer or its agent must
fulfill the terms of its decisions.
4. Provides arbitrators who are assigned to decide disputes with copies
of, and instruction in, the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission's
regulations in Part 703 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
those regulations read on January 1, 1987, Division 2 (commencing with
Section 2101) of the Commercial Code, and this chapter.
5. Requires the manufacturer, when the process orders, under the terms of
this chapter, either that the nonconforming motor vehicle be replaced if
the buyer consents to this remedy or that restitution be made to the
buyer, to replace the motor vehicle or make restitution in accordance with
paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2.
6. Provides, at the request of the arbitrator or a majority of the
arbitration panel, for an inspection and written report on the condition
of a nonconforming motor vehicle, at no cost to the buyer, by an
automobile expert who is independent of the manufacturer.
7. Takes into account, in rendering decisions, all legal and equitable
factors, including, but not limited to, the written warranty, the rights
and remedies conferred in regulations of the Federal Trade Commission
contained in Part 703 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
those regulations read on January 1, 1987, Division 2 (commencing with
Section 2101) of the Commercial Code, this chapter, and any other
equitable considerations appropriate in the circumstances. Nothing in this
chapter requires that, to be certified as a qualified third-party dispute
resolution process pursuant to this section, decisions of the process must
consider or provide remedies in the form of awards of punitive damages or
multiple damages, under subdivision (c) of Section 1794, or of attorneys'
fees under subdivision (d) of Section 1794, or of consequential damages
other than as provided in subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 1794,
including, but not limited to, reasonable repair, towing, and rental car
costs actually incurred by the buyer.
8. Requires that no arbitrator deciding a dispute may be a party to the
dispute and that no other person, including an employee, agent, or dealer
for the manufacturer, may be allowed to participate substantively in the
merits of any dispute with the arbitrator unless the buyer is allowed to
participate also. Nothing in this subdivision prohibits any member of an
arbitration board from deciding a dispute.
9. Obtains and maintains certification by the Department of Consumer
Affairs pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 472) of Division 1
of the Business and Professions Code.
5. For the purposes of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2 and this section,
the following terms have the following meanings:
1. "Nonconformity" means a nonconformity which substantially impairs the
use, value, or safety of the new motor vehicle to the buyer or lessee.
2. "New motor vehicle" means a new motor vehicle which is used or bought
for use primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. "New motor
vehicle" includes the chassis, chassis cab, and that portion of a motor
home devoted to its propulsion, but does not include any portion designed,
used, or maintained primarily for human habitation, a dealer-owned vehicle
and a "demonstrator" or other motor vehicle sold with a manufacturer's new
car warranty but does not include a motorcycle or a motor vehicle which is
not registered under the Vehicle Code because it is to be operated or used
exclusively off the highways. A "demonstrator" is a vehicle assigned by a
dealer for the purpose of demonstrating qualities and characteristics
common to vehicles of the same or similar model and type.
3. "Motor home" means a vehicular unit built on, or permanently attached
to, a self-propelled motor vehicle chassis, chassis cab, or van, which
becomes an integral part of the completed vehicle, designed for human
habitation for recreational or emergency occupancy.
6.
1. Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall sell, either at
wholesale or retail, lease, or transfer a motor vehicle transferred by a
buyer or lessee to a manufacturer pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(d) of Section 1793.2 or a similar statute of any other state, unless the
nature of the nonconformity experienced by the original buyer or lessee is
clearly and conspicuously disclosed to the prospective buyer, lessee, or
transferee, the nonconformity is corrected, and the manufacturer warrants
to the new buyer, lessee, or transferee in writing for a period of one
year that the motor vehicle is free of that nonconformity.
2. Except for the requirement that the nature of the nonconformity be
disclosed to the transferee, paragraph (1) does not apply to the transfer
of a motor vehicle to an educational institution if the purpose of the
transfer is to make the motor vehicle available for use in automotive
repair courses.
|